Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. William G. Graves, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. William G. Graves appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-02-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7542

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. William G. Graves appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. William G. Graves, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. William G. Graves appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7542

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM G. GRAVES, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CR-90-221-B)

    Submitted:

    January 20, 2000

    Decided:

    February 2, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William G. Graves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William G. Graves appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for reduction of his sentence.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See United States v. Graves, No. CR-90-221-B (D. Md. Oct.

    21, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like