Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Dewayne Gilmore, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Dewayne Gilmore's motion to receive credit for time served. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that additional argument would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Gilmore's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6132

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Dewayne Gilmore's motion to receive credit for time served. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that additional argument would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Gilmore's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Dewayne Gilmore, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Dewayne Gilmore's motion to receive credit for time served. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and that additional argument would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Gilmore's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6132

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DEWAYNE GILMORE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cr-00014-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    April 25, 2013

    Before AGEE and


    Circuit Judge.

    WYNN,

    Circuit

    Decided: April 30, 2013

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dewayne Gilmore,
    Assistant United
    Appellee.

    Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Ronald Gill,
    States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dewayne

    Gilmore

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying his motion to receive credit for time served.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Gilmore, No. 3:08-cr-00014-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14,


    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like