Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wilbur Green, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Wilbur Derrick Green appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7650

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Wilbur Derrick Green appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Wilbur Green, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Wilbur Derrick Green appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7650

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    WILBUR DERRICK GREEN,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (4:06-cr-00031-JLK-1)

    Submitted:

    March 15, 2012

    Decided:

    March 20, 2012

    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wilbur Derrick Green, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wilbur

    Derrick

    Green

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    States

    v.

    2011).
    legal
    before

    Green,

    No.

    4:06-cr-00031-JLK-1

    (W.D.

    Va.

    United

    Nov.

    28,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like