Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jerry Oliver, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerry G. Oliver's motion to reduce his sentence. Oliver appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6601

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerry G. Oliver's motion to reduce his sentence. Oliver appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Jerry Oliver, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerry G. Oliver's motion to reduce his sentence. Oliver appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6601

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    JERRY G. OLIVER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:09-cr-00036-RAJ-FBS-1)

    Submitted:

    June 14, 2012

    Decided: June 20, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerry G. Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.


    Cameron Rountree, Special
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry

    G.

    Oliver

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction


    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district

    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Oliver,

    2:09-cr-00036-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2012).

    No.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like