Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Golson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The document is a 3 paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Malcolm Golson's motion filed under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The court reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 17, 2008 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7229

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a 3 paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Malcolm Golson's motion filed under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The court reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 17, 2008 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Golson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a 3 paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Malcolm Golson's motion filed under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The court reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 17, 2008 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7229

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (2:01-cr-00047-RGD-1)

    Submitted:

    November 13, 2008

    Decided:

    November 21, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Laura Pellatiro
    Tayman,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Newport
    News,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals a district court order
    denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts order and
    find no error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

    the district court.

    See United States v. Golson, No. 2:01-cr-

    00047-RGD

    June

    (E.D.

    Va.

    17,

    2008).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like