Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stuart v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Leroy Angloson Stuart filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as outlined in its September 22, 2004 order denying Stuart's petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7742

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Leroy Angloson Stuart filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as outlined in its September 22, 2004 order denying Stuart's petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Stuart v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Leroy Angloson Stuart filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as outlined in its September 22, 2004 order denying Stuart's petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7742

    LEROY ANGLOSON STUART,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-04-527)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2005

    Decided:

    May 24, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Leroy Angloson Stuart, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Leroy Angloson Stuart, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district

    See

    court.

    Stuart

    (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2004).

    v.

    United

    States,

    No.

    CA-04-527

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like