Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wardrick v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief on Robert Junior Wardrick's civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-07-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6540

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief on Robert Junior Wardrick's civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Wardrick v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief on Robert Junior Wardrick's civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6540

    ROBERT JUNIOR WARDRICK,


    Plaintiff -

    Appellant,

    versus
    USA; ROBERT OVERFIELD, Detective; JOHN KELLY,
    Officer; THOMAS J. LOVE, Special Agent; SHAWN
    GARRITY, Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03319)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2003

    Decided:

    July 30, 2003

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Junior Wardrick, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Junior Wardrick appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Wardrick, No. CA-03-319 (D. Md. Feb. 11, 2003).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like