Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ingram v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Walter Ingram filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft. The district court denied relief and Ingram appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7018

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Ingram filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft. The district court denied relief and Ingram appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Ingram v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Ingram filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft. The district court denied relief and Ingram appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7018

    WALTER LOUIS INGRAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA04-1550-JFM)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2004

    Decided:

    September 24, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Walter Louis Ingram, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Ingram v. Ashcroft, No. CA-04-1550-JFM (D. Md.


    filed May 21, 2004 & entered June 8, 2004).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like