Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Threet, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Arnold Threet's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Threet's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion dated August 28, 2000.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7457

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Arnold Threet's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Threet's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion dated August 28, 2000.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Threet, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Arnold Threet's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Threet's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion dated August 28, 2000.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7457

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ARNOLD THREET,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-9859-L, CA-00-2493-L)

    Submitted:

    January 5, 2001

    Decided:

    January 18, 2001

    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Arnold Threet, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States
    Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Arnold Threet seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2000).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Threet, Nos. CR-98-59-L; CA-00-2493L (D. Md. filed Aug. 28, 2000; entered Aug. 29, 2000).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like