Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Garcia, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Edith Anibal Garcia appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Garcia's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Garcia was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7002

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edith Anibal Garcia appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Garcia's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Garcia was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Garcia, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edith Anibal Garcia appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Garcia's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Garcia was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7002

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDITH ANIBAL GARCIA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94256-L, CA-98-2448-L)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2002

    Decided:

    January 28, 2002

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Edith Anibal Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edith Anibal Garcia seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny Garcias

    motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Garcia,

    Nos. CR-94-256-L, CA-98-2448-L (D. Md. May 15, 2001).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like