Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Green, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Dennis Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Green was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6417

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dennis Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Green was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Green, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dennis Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Green was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6417

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DENNIS IVAN GREEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-87-28-BO, CA-0-155-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    August 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Dennis Ivan Green, Appellant Pro Se.
    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dennis I. Green appeals the district courts orders denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and
    denying his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the rec-

    ord and the district courts opinions and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States v.

    Green, Nos. CR-87-28-BO; CA-0-155-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2000 &


    Jan. 11, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like