Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Redfern, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Andre Redfern's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeal was therefore denied and dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-98-567 and CA-00-1335-17-0.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7791

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Andre Redfern's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeal was therefore denied and dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-98-567 and CA-00-1335-17-0.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Redfern, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Andre Redfern's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeal was therefore denied and dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-98-567 and CA-00-1335-17-0.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7791

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    HENRY ANDRE REDFERN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-98-567, CA-00-1335-17-0)

    Submitted:

    March 22, 2001

    Decided:

    March 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Henry Andre Redfern, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Henry Andre Redfern seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.
    00-1335-17-0

    United States v. Redfern, Nos. CR-98-567; CA-

    (D.S.C.

    Oct.

    11,

    2000).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like