Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lundquist v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Robert Lundquist filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied his petition. Lundquist appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lundquist a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6811

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Lundquist filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied his petition. Lundquist appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lundquist a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Lundquist v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Lundquist filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied his petition. Lundquist appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lundquist a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6811

    ROBERT EDWARD LUNDQUIST,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-1047-5-F)
    Submitted:

    November 6, 1997

    Decided:

    November 25, 1997

    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Edward Lundquist, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Lundquist v. North Carolina, No. CA-96-1047-5-F (E.D.N.C.
    Apr. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like