Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Dunlap, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1997 in which J.W. Dunlap appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6828

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1997 in which J.W. Dunlap appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Dunlap, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1997 in which J.W. Dunlap appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6828

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    J. W. DUNLAP,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-85-3, CR-85-7, CR-85-8, CR-85-9, CR-85-10)
    Submitted:

    September 25, 1997

    Decided:

    November 14, 1997

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    J. W. Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Dunlap, Nos. CR-85-3, CR-85-7, CR-85-8, CR85-9, CR-85-10 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 1997).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like