Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sellers v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Gordon Russell Sellers appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Sellers a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Sellers was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6100

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gordon Russell Sellers appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Sellers a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Sellers was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Sellers v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gordon Russell Sellers appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Sellers a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Sellers was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6100

    GORDON RUSSELL SELLERS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-00-1243-AM)

    Submitted:

    May 17, 2001

    Decided:

    May 25, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gordon Russell Sellers, Appellant Pro Se.
    Marla Graff Decker,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gordon Russell Sellers seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See Sellers v. Angelone, No.

    CA-00-1243-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like