Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tillman, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Arthur Lee Tillman appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Tillman's § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6970

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Arthur Lee Tillman appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Tillman's § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Tillman, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Arthur Lee Tillman appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Tillman's § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6970

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ARTHUR LEE TILLMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-92-270)

    Submitted:

    March 22, 2001

    Decided:

    March 28, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Arthur Lee Tillman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Arthur Lee Tillman appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See United States v. Tillman, No. CR-92-270 (W.D.N.C. June

    26, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like