Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. Dept of Public Safety, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    George Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit also denied Johnson's motions for summary judgment and oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented without need for argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6362

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit also denied Johnson's motions for summary judgment and oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented without need for argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Dept of Public Safety, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit also denied Johnson's motions for summary judgment and oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented without need for argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6362

    GEORGE JOHNSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
    SERVICES,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-05-279-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    September 21, 2005

    Decided:

    October 18, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Johnson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Johnson v. Dept

    of Public Safety, No. CA-05-279-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2005).

    We

    deny Johnsons motions for summary judgment and for oral argument.
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like