Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mann, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Robert Cy Mann appealed the district court's denial of his motion for return of property. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Mann's motion, as outlined in United States v. Mann, No. CA-02-2687-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6512

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Cy Mann appealed the district court's denial of his motion for return of property. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Mann's motion, as outlined in United States v. Mann, No. CA-02-2687-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Mann, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Cy Mann appealed the district court's denial of his motion for return of property. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Mann's motion, as outlined in United States v. Mann, No. CA-02-2687-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6512

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Defendant - Appellee,
    versus
    ROBERT CY MANN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-022687-MJG)

    Submitted:

    August 19, 2003

    Decided:

    August 26, 2003

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Cy Mann, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Cy Mann appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.

    See United States v. Mann, No. CA-02-2687-

    MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like