Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Baker v. Sacchet, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Reese Marvin Baker's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6768

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Reese Marvin Baker's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Baker v. Sacchet, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Reese Marvin Baker's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6768

    REESE MARVIN BAKER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-01-518-WMN)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Decided:

    August 20, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Reese Marvin Baker, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Reese Marvin Baker seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.
    17, 2002).

    Baker v. Sacchet, No. CA-01-518-WMN (D. Md. Apr.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like