Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Richmond v. Sacchet, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Guy Lancaster Richmond filed two lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Joseph P. Sacchet, the State of Maryland, and other defendants. The district court denied Richmond relief in both cases. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6134

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Guy Lancaster Richmond filed two lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Joseph P. Sacchet, the State of Maryland, and other defendants. The district court denied Richmond relief in both cases. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Richmond v. Sacchet, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guy Lancaster Richmond filed two lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Joseph P. Sacchet, the State of Maryland, and other defendants. The district court denied Richmond relief in both cases. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6134

    GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH P. SACCHET; STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 00-6135

    GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
    (CA-99-2450-WMN, CA-99-3861-WMN)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 2000

    Decided:

    June 5, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Guy Lancaster Richmond appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaints.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinions and find no reversible error.


    the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    See Richmond v. Sacchet, No.

    CA-99-2450-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1999); Richmond v. Maryland, No.


    CA-99-3861-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 5, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argu-

    ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like