Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Richardson v. State of MD, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case in which William Lee Richardson Jr. appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against the State of Maryland and First National Bank of Maryland. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's determination that Richardson's suit was frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, saying the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case in which William Lee Richardson Jr. appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against the State of Maryland and First National Bank of Maryland. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's determination that Richardson's suit was frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, saying the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Richardson v. State of MD, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case in which William Lee Richardson Jr. appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against the State of Maryland and First National Bank of Maryland. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's determination that Richardson's suit was frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, saying the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1165

    WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE STATE OF MARYLAND; FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF
    MARYLAND, a/k/a All First,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA00-129-S)

    Submitted:

    March 23, 2000

    Decided:

    March 30, 2000

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous under 28
    U.S.C. 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Richardson v. Maryland, No. CA-00-129-S (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2000). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like