Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Tariq Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Williams' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Williams was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6890

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tariq Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Williams' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Williams was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tariq Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Williams' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Williams was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6890

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TARIQ WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-97-39, CA-02-187)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Decided:

    August 22, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tariq Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tariq Williams seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-97-39, CA-02-187 (S.D.W. Va. May


    10, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like