Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Richardson v. State of MD, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. It dismisses William Lee Richardson Jr.'s appeal of a district court ruling, which had dismissed his civil complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. It therefore denies Richardson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-2190

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. It dismisses William Lee Richardson Jr.'s appeal of a district court ruling, which had dismissed his civil complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. It therefore denies Richardson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Richardson v. State of MD, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. It dismisses William Lee Richardson Jr.'s appeal of a district court ruling, which had dismissed his civil complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. It therefore denies Richardson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-2190

    WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE STATE OF MARYLAND; THE STATE
    VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    OF

    WEST
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-01-778-2)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2002

    Decided:

    January 28, 2002

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William Lee Richardson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
    courts order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have
    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the
    magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
    the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Richardson

    v. Maryland, No. CA-01-778-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 2001).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like