Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    William Lewis Hinson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to quash his indictment and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court granted Hinson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7082

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Lewis Hinson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to quash his indictment and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court granted Hinson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Hinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Lewis Hinson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to quash his indictment and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court granted Hinson's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7082

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM LEWIS HINSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-258-P)

    Submitted:

    February 22, 2001

    Decided:

    February 28, 2001

    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William Lewis Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William Lewis Hinson appeals the district courts order denying his Motion to Quash Indictment and Dismiss Action for Lack of
    Jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we grant Hin-

    sons motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Hinson,

    No. CR-93-258-P (W.D.N.C. Jul. 21, 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like