Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Richmond v. MCI, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Guy Lancaster Richmond against the Maryland Correctional Institution and Health Services, Incorporated. The district court denied relief to Richmond and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6754

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Guy Lancaster Richmond against the Maryland Correctional Institution and Health Services, Incorporated. The district court denied relief to Richmond and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Richmond v. MCI, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Guy Lancaster Richmond against the Maryland Correctional Institution and Health Services, Incorporated. The district court denied relief to Richmond and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6754

    GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION;
    HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

    PRISON
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA96-808-WMN)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 24, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen,
    Mindy S. Kursban, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, SHIPLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Maryland Correctional Institution, No. CA-96-808-WMN (D.
    Md. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like