Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McKain v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Charles McKain appealed the district court's denial of his motion for the return of property that was seized by the government. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors. The Fourth Circuit determined the district court correctly denied the motion for return of property based on the facts and legal arguments presented. It also affirmed the denial of McKain's motion for reconsideration of the initial ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6627

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles McKain appealed the district court's denial of his motion for the return of property that was seized by the government. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors. The Fourth Circuit determined the district court correctly denied the motion for return of property based on the facts and legal arguments presented. It also affirmed the denial of McKain's motion for reconsideration of the initial ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    McKain v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles McKain appealed the district court's denial of his motion for the return of property that was seized by the government. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors. The Fourth Circuit determined the district court correctly denied the motion for return of property based on the facts and legal arguments presented. It also affirmed the denial of McKain's motion for reconsideration of the initial ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6627

    CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CA-02-474-B)

    Submitted:

    June 13, 2002

    Decided:

    June 19, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Anton McKain, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles

    Anton

    McKain

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for the return of property and the marginal
    order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
    record and the district courts orders and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See McKain v. United States, No. CA-02-474-B (D. Md. Mar. 22
    & Apr. 2, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like