Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennis Williams' motion for reduction of sentence. Williams appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its ruling and did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6467

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennis Williams' motion for reduction of sentence. Williams appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its ruling and did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennis Williams' motion for reduction of sentence. Williams appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its ruling and did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6467

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DENNIS WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
    (1:89-cr-00104-CCB-6)

    Submitted: June 22, 2006

    Decided: July 3, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dennis Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephen Matthew Schenning,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dennis

    Williams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    United States v. Williams, No. 1:89-cr-00104-

    CCB-6 (D. Md., Jan. 20, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like