Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crosby, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Keith Crosby's motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The court also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6342

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Keith Crosby's motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The court also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Crosby, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Keith Crosby's motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The court also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6342

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEITH TYRONE CROSBY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR85-609-JH)

    Submitted:

    May 17, 2001

    Decided:

    May 29, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Keith Tyrone Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning,
    United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Keith Tyrone Crosby appeals the district courts order dismissing his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    United States v. Crosby, No. CR-85-609-H (D. Md. Feb. 6,

    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like