Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Kevin Rodell Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court's unpublished opinion denying Johnson's motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7199

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kevin Rodell Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court's unpublished opinion denying Johnson's motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kevin Rodell Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court's unpublished opinion denying Johnson's motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7199

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEVIN RODELL JOHNSON, a/k/a Chucky,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-95-319-A)
    Submitted:

    December 11, 1997

    Decided:

    December 31, 1997

    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kevin Rodell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
    motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Johnson, No. CR-95-319-A (E.D. Va. July 23,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like