Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lateef v. VA Parole Board, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Abdul Lateef filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lateef a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7160

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Abdul Lateef filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lateef a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Lateef v. VA Parole Board, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Abdul Lateef filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Lateef a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7160

    ABDUL LATEEF,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District
    Judge. (CA-96-1244-AM)
    Submitted:

    December 11, 1997

    Decided:

    December 31, 1997

    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Abdul Lateef, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Lateef v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-961244-AM (E.D. Va. July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like