Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crowe, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Clayton Perry Crowe appealed a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Clayton Perry Crowe appealed a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Crowe, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Clayton Perry Crowe appealed a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6097

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CLAYTON PERRY CROWE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-94-32)

    Submitted:

    April 13, 2000

    Decided:

    April 21, 2000

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Clayton Perry Crowe, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clayton Perry Crowe appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
    18 U.S.C. 3582 (1994).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States


    v. Crowe, No. CR-94-32 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 1999).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like