Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michael Williams appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7006

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Williams appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Williams appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7006

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H)

    Submitted: October 17, 2006

    Decided: October 20, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Christine Blaise
    Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    United States v. Williams No. 2:95-cr-

    00009-H (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like