Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nelson v. Barry, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Jack Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stan G. Barry and Ron Angelone. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's determination that Nelson failed to state a valid claim. The appellate court also denied Nelson's motion to add four additional individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-11-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7295

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jack Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stan G. Barry and Ron Angelone. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's determination that Nelson failed to state a valid claim. The appellate court also denied Nelson's motion to add four additional individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Nelson v. Barry, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jack Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stan G. Barry and Ron Angelone. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's determination that Nelson failed to state a valid claim. The appellate court also denied Nelson's motion to add four additional individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7295

    JACK NELSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STAN G. BARRY, Sheriff Fairfax County; RON
    ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of
    Corrections,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-04-657-1)

    Submitted:

    November 3, 2004

    Decided:

    November 17, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jack Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jack Nelson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
    state a claim pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) (2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Nelson v.

    Barry, No. CA-04-657-1 (E.D. Va. July 13, 2004).

    The court has

    also received a motion seeking to add four individuals who were not
    parties to this case in the district court as parties to this
    appeal.

    We deny this motion.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like