Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wells v. Ray, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Melvin B. Wells Jr. filed a §1983 complaint against Clark Ray and the City of Norfolk Neighborhood Preservation. The district court denied Wells relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1977

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Melvin B. Wells Jr. filed a §1983 complaint against Clark Ray and the City of Norfolk Neighborhood Preservation. The district court denied Wells relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Wells v. Ray, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Melvin B. Wells Jr. filed a §1983 complaint against Clark Ray and the City of Norfolk Neighborhood Preservation. The district court denied Wells relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1977

    MELVIN B. WELLS, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CLARK RAY, City
    Preservation,

    of

    Norfolk,

    Neighborhood
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-04-219-2)

    Submitted:

    December 9, 2004

    Decided:

    December 14, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Melvin B. Wells, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harold Phillip Juren,


    Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Melvin B. Wells, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Wells v.

    Ray, No. CA-04-219-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 6, 2004 & entered July 7,
    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like