Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wendell Betancourt, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Wendell Edward Betancourt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order denying Betancourt's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6501

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wendell Edward Betancourt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order denying Betancourt's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Wendell Betancourt, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wendell Edward Betancourt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order denying Betancourt's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6501

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WENDELL EDWARD BETANCOURT, a/k/a Shawn Nelson, a/k/a Fire,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00025-JPB-JES-5)

    Submitted:

    July 1, 2013

    Decided:

    July 9, 2013

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wendell Edward Betancourt, Appellant Pro Se.


    Paul Thomas
    Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West
    Virginia, for Appellee
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wendell Edward Betancourt appeals the district courts
    order

    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    sentence

    reduction

    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See United States v.

    Betancourt, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-JES-5 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 19,


    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like