Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bennett, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Carl Bennett's motion to reduce his sentence. Bennett had appealed the district court's refusal to lower his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bennett's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8553

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Carl Bennett's motion to reduce his sentence. Bennett had appealed the district court's refusal to lower his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bennett's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Bennett, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Carl Bennett's motion to reduce his sentence. Bennett had appealed the district court's refusal to lower his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bennett's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8553

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CARL EDWARD BENNETT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2009

    Decided:

    March 24, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carl Edward Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd Hagins,


    SOUTH
    CAROLINA
    LAW
    ENFORCEMENT
    DIVISION,
    Columbia,
    South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carl Edward Bennett appeals from the district courts
    order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Bennett, No. 0:04-

    cr-00657-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2008).


    argument

    as

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    We dispense with oral

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    addressed in the materials before the court and argument would


    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like