Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Under Seal, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which an unnamed defendant, referred to as "Under Seal," appealed the denial of their motion to reduce their sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion, and in a brief per curiam opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7889

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which an unnamed defendant, referred to as "Under Seal," appealed the denial of their motion to reduce their sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion, and in a brief per curiam opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Under Seal, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which an unnamed defendant, referred to as "Under Seal," appealed the denial of their motion to reduce their sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion, and in a brief per curiam opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7889

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    UNDER SEAL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00019-GCM-1)

    Submitted:

    February 18, 2010

    Decided:

    March 5, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se.


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Appellee.

    Kenneth Michel Smith, OFFICE OF


    Charlotte, North Carolina, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Under Seal appeals the district courts order denying
    his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in
    sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Under Seal, No. 3:01-cr-00019-

    GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like