Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Earl Scott appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's judgment. The Fourth Circuit denied Scott's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its December 24, 1997 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6627

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earl Scott appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's judgment. The Fourth Circuit denied Scott's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its December 24, 1997 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Scott appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's judgment. The Fourth Circuit denied Scott's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its December 24, 1997 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6627

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EARL SCOTT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
    Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-89-183, CA-97-738)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 1998

    Decided:

    February 10, 1999

    Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Earl Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Glenn Chandler, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Earl Scott seeks to appeal the district courts judgment denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts judg-

    ment and order and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny

    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the


    reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Scott, Nos.

    CR-89-183; CA-97-738 (D.S.C. Dec. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like