Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Salley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Salley's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its January 5 and January 30, 2009 orders denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6089

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Salley's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its January 5 and January 30, 2009 orders denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Salley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Salley's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its January 5 and January 30, 2009 orders denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6089

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    GERALD SALLEY, a/k/a Arthur Jackson, a/k/a G,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA-3)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 28, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gerald Salley,
    United
    States
    Appellee.

    Appellant Pro Se.


    Sean Kittrell, Assistant
    Attorney,
    Charleston,
    South
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gerald

    Salley

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    United States v. Salley, No.

    stated by the district court.

    3:95-cr-00488-JFA-3 (D.S.C. Jan. 5 & Jan. 30, 2009); see United


    States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like