Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Stacey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michael Stacey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). An appellate panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in that circuit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7267

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Stacey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). An appellate panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in that circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Stacey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Stacey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). An appellate panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in that circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7267

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL STACEY, a/k/a Sadat,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00134-GCM-4)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 2009

    Decided:

    September 16, 2009

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Stacey, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy
    Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Stacey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Stacey, No. 3:03-

    cr-00134-GCM-4 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like