Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Scotty Antoine Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the issues raised below. The appeals court declined to address any issues not raised in the district court and dismissed Davis's appeal, denying his request for a certificate of appealability. The appeals court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6646

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Scotty Antoine Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the issues raised below. The appeals court declined to address any issues not raised in the district court and dismissed Davis's appeal, denying his request for a certificate of appealability. The appeals court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Scotty Antoine Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the issues raised below. The appeals court declined to address any issues not raised in the district court and dismissed Davis's appeal, denying his request for a certificate of appealability. The appeals court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6646

    SCOTTY ANTOINE DAVIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-95-34-3-MU, CA-97-563-3-MU-2)

    Submitted:

    June 22, 1999

    Decided:

    August 5, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Scotty Antoine Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Scott Broyles,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Scotty Antoine Davis seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error on the issues raised below, and we
    decline to address any issues not raised below.

    See Davis v.

    United States, Nos. CR-95-34-3-MU; CA-97-563-3-MU-2 (W.D.N.C. Nov.


    7, 1997; Apr. 26, 1999).

    Accordingly, we deny Daviss motion for

    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like