Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mosley v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Antonio Mosley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 motion as untimely. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Mosley's § 2254 motion was not filed in a timely manner.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6911

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Antonio Mosley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 motion as untimely. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Mosley's § 2254 motion was not filed in a timely manner.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Mosley v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Antonio Mosley appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 motion as untimely. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Mosley's § 2254 motion was not filed in a timely manner.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6911

    ANTONIO MOSLEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; J. J. CLARK,
    Superintendent, Southern Correctional Institution,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-99-63-1)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2000

    Decided:

    January 19, 2000

    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Antonio Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.
    Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Antonio Mosley seeks to appeal the district courts order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate


    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
    the district court.

    See Mosley v. Attorney Gen., No. CA-99-63-1

    (M.D.N.C. June 18, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like