Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sullivan, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlton Christopher Sullivan appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in the district court's orders from September 23, 2008 and August 6, 2008. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8194

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlton Christopher Sullivan appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in the district court's orders from September 23, 2008 and August 6, 2008. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Sullivan, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlton Christopher Sullivan appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in the district court's orders from September 23, 2008 and August 6, 2008. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8194

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    CARLTON CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN,
    Defendant

    - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 27, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlton Christopher Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se.


    Johnston,
    Chan
    Park,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Deborah A.
    Attorneys,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlton

    Christopher

    Sullivan

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence


    under

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006).

    record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Sullivan, No. 8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4 (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2008; Aug.


    6, 2008).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like