Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Graves v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Clifton Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against Frank Sizer. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7497

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Clifton Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against Frank Sizer. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Graves v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Clifton Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against Frank Sizer. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7497

    CLIFTON V. GRAVES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANK SIZER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-041046-AMD)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2005

    Decided:

    February 16, 2005

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Clifton V. Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph A. Curran, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clifton V. Graves appeals the district courts dismissal
    of his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

    1983 (2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Graves v.

    Sizer, No. CA-04-1046-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with
    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like