Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Fredrick Battle, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Fredrick Demond Battle appealed the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appeals court decided that the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision. They affirmed the lower court's denial of Battle's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-11-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7337

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Fredrick Demond Battle appealed the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appeals court decided that the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision. They affirmed the lower court's denial of Battle's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Fredrick Battle, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Fredrick Demond Battle appealed the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appeals court decided that the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision. They affirmed the lower court's denial of Battle's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7337

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    FREDRICK DEMOND BATTLE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-00150-D-1)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 2014

    Decided:

    November 24, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Fredrick Demond Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Denise Walker, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Fredrick Demond Battle appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2012) motion.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Battle, No. 5:09-cr-00150-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2015).


    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions

    are

    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like