Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ronald Doby, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ronald Wendell Doby's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Doby's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-09-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6794

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ronald Wendell Doby's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Doby's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Ronald Doby, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ronald Wendell Doby's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Doby's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6794

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RONALD WENDELL DOBY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:08-cr-00029-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2012

    Decided:

    September 13, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald Wendell Doby, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald Wendell Doby appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Doby, No. 3:08-cr-00029-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2012).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like