Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rodney Allen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Rodney Lamont Allen appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent for the circuit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7435

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rodney Lamont Allen appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent for the circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Rodney Allen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rodney Lamont Allen appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent for the circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7435

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RODNEY LAMONT ALLEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (1:07-cr-00032-MR-1)

    Submitted:

    November 13, 2012

    Decided:

    December 18, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodney Lamont Allen, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rodney Lamont Allen appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    (W.D.N.C.

    Aug.

    United States v. Allen, No. 1:07-cr-00032-MR-1


    10,

    2012).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like