Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ronald Dawson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Ronald Dawson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasons for denying Dawson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7232

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Dawson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasons for denying Dawson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Ronald Dawson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Dawson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasons for denying Dawson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7232

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RONALD DAWSON, a/k/a Tree,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:06-cr-00061-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    February 9, 2012

    Decided:

    February 14, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald Dawson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Jennifer P.


    May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald

    Dawson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.


    3582

    (2006).

    We

    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    argument

    adequately

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    5:06-cr-00061-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2011).


    oral

    and

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    v.

    Dawson,

    No.

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like