Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ingram, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Wesley Ingram's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Ingram appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Ingram's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6306

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Wesley Ingram's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Ingram appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Ingram's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Ingram, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Wesley Ingram's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Ingram appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Ingram's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6306

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOHN WESLEY INGRAM,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00372-JAB-1)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2011

    Decided:

    June 1, 2011

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Wesley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Wesley Ingram appeals the district courts order
    denying
    (2006).
    error.

    his

    motion

    filed

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Ingram, No. 1:03-cr-00372-JAB-

    1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2011).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like