Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Joel Henry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joel Eugene Henry's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's November 6, 2012 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-8103

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joel Eugene Henry's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's November 6, 2012 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Joel Henry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joel Eugene Henry's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's November 6, 2012 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-8103

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOEL EUGENE HENRY, a/k/a Sleepy,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Richard L.
    Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2013

    Decided: March 1, 2013

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joel Eugene Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy
    Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joel Eugene Henry appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
    sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Henry, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-

    CH-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like